Loki vs Elastic vs Splunk
Three log backends. Decision criteria.
Loki
Cheap; label-based indexing only. Storage on object storage. Cost: $1-5 per GB/month.
Best for: K8s-heavy, Grafana-stack shops. Cost-sensitive teams with structured logs and label-based query patterns.
Limitation: poor for full-text search. Content searches scan rather than index.
Elasticsearch
Mature; full-text search; broad ecosystem. Kibana, Beats, Logstash, ML features.
Best for: full-text search needs, mature Elastic operations, regulated industries with retention requirements.
Cost: $20-50 per GB/month. Operational complexity real; index lifecycle management essential.
Splunk
Enterprise-grade; expensive; powerful. Industry standard at large enterprises.
Best for: orgs already on Splunk, compliance environments, very large scale operations.
Cost: significantly higher than Loki or Elastic. Pricing model based on daily ingest; budget carefully.
Decision matrix
Cost-sensitive, K8s-heavy, Grafana stack: Loki.
Mid-market, full-text needs: Elastic.
Enterprise with budget: Splunk for compliance and scale; Elastic if Splunk cost is unjustified.