Cross-Region Incident Coordination
Multi-region incidents need cross-region coordination. The pattern that keeps regions in sync.
One IC
One incident commander runs a multi-region incident. Per-region leads execute locally; the IC owns the global picture and the cross-region decisions. Multiple ICs across regions produces conflict, not coverage.
- Single global IC. One named IC per incident, even when multiple regions are affected. The IC aggregates; regional leads execute.
- Per-region leads. Each affected region carries its own named lead. Reports up to the IC; runs the local response.
- IC bench. The IC pool is deep enough to cover handoffs across timezones. Long incidents need multiple ICs in sequence.
- Explicit handoff. Each IC handoff is documented with current state, open decisions, and active actions. Continuity survives the handoff.
One channel
One main channel keeps the global picture readable. Per-region sub-channels carry technical detail without flooding the main thread.
- Main incident channel. Global Slack channel for status updates and decisions only. No raw debugging here.
- Per-region sub-channels. Technical detail and debugging stays local to the region’s sub-channel.
- Decisions surface to main. Each cross-region decision posts in the main channel. The IC sees everything that matters globally.
- Per-channel scribe. Each channel has a named timeline owner. Postmortem reconstruction depends on the scribe’s notes.
Decisions
Decision authority splits along the region-versus-global line. Region-local actions stay with regional leads; cross-region actions belong to the IC. Mixing the two produces conflict during failover.
- Region-specific actions. Local restart, local config change, local traffic redirect. Region lead decides without IC sign-off.
- Cross-region actions. Failover, global traffic shift, global rollback. IC authority required.
- Documented owner per decision. Each decision names the decider. Escalation friction disappears when the authority is written down.
- Timestamped sign-off log. Each decision records the timestamp and decider. Postmortems reconstruct the sequence cleanly.