Postmortems Beginner By Samson Tanimawo, PhD Published Dec 15, 2026 8 min read

Postmortem Anti-Patterns: Five Templates That Quietly Destroy Learning

The shape of a postmortem decides what gets learned. Most templates select for blame avoidance; few select for change.

Why most postmortems do not change anything

A postmortem that does not result in a system change is not a postmortem; it is a confessional. The exercise is satisfying in the moment and worthless three months later.

The diagnosis: most templates ask ‘what happened’ and ‘who was on call’ but treat ‘what changes as a result’ as a small box at the end. The structure of the document signals what matters.

Five anti-patterns

The three changes that reverse them

1. Lead with the action items. Page one. Each one has an owner, a deadline, a definition of ‘done.’

2. Replace narrative with a timeline. Times, events, decisions. The story emerges; the politics do not.

3. Track the action items in the same system as feature work. They have to compete for engineering time and win.

Action items that actually ship

Antipatterns within antipatterns

What to do this week

Three moves. (1) Replace your postmortem template’s leading section with the action-items list. (2) Add postmortem action items as work items in your sprint board. (3) Schedule a 90-day review meeting on the calendar before closing the postmortem.